
There is a saying, opinions are like belly buttons, each one different, actually, it is part of the body, still in the South. This is particularly true when it comes to diet.
I have been blogging about health and diet for almost five years. At the beginning, I am very bias from the (unfortunately), blogged, the promotion of the "guru 's" vegan, Mediterranean agenda. I'm not vegan, Mediterranean, never had.
Today I blog more objectively. Some diet-blog readers say the vegetarian agenda is kehitystietojen. I am far from it. I'm not even a vegetarian. I eat mostly fruits and vegetables, and meat, poultry, dairy, or eggs, but the fish to eat. To be honest, my diet is more than anything else in the Mediterranean.
Spent time blogging about diet-which seems like an eternity passed much different, contrary to what has occurred, and the downright radical views. When you blog about lifestyle vegan, Mediterranean (as I did too many years), you can get a lot of tree-huggers and off the hippies who chant, "down to the meat, milk and milk products and cattle ranchers. Eat more Kohlrabi! And save the whales! "
What does this lead? Backlash in the opposite opinion; Pro-Meat people. In most cases, it is the low-carb Atkins, seriously. And you've taken my fair share of backlash, especially when a paid shill. "You idiot," they scream, "people are hunters. We've designed only to eat meat. Masai live hundred nothing but the blood, guts and offal. Oh, and screw the whales! "
This is my point. Vegetarians and the lack of a better term, "low-carbers," represent a very small proportion of the population. Both are lifestyles is a radical and too restrictive for the average American. People want to eat all sorts of things better or worse.
A peeved off vegan, Mediterranean or low carber is like the guy standing in Times Square, screaming into the megaphone "Sinners, the world is Ending. You must repent! " Yeah he is there, make a fuss, but nobody listens.
Now why I bring this? Well this week with the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) published 2010 diet guidelines for Americans and you've already seen it in the light of the heavy criticism of our two radical groups. It has too many grains and not enough low-carbers and it is Earthy-crunchy, uber-vegetable beef enough for Vegetarians.
the main of the new guidelines basically says "meet the new boss, same as the old boss." USDA officials are encouraged to continue to enjoy their food, but to eat and healthier fare: nutrient dense foods closed, such as vegetables, fruits, whole grains, fat-free or low-fat milk and milk products, seafood, poultry and lean certification, eggs, beans, and Peas, nuts and seeds. Also, the old standby of advice: to restrict saturated fat, fast food, and refined sugar and confectionery. Is du.
But guess what to pay attention to Vegetarians seriously-and low-carbers-these guidelines are the best time to do this, the Government of the United States.
The vast majority of people eat some part of this, and that includes meat, grains, fruits and vegetables. Maybe it's because we are omnivores. But if you prefer, you can either be a radical vegan, Mediterranean or low-carb, Go right ahead just should not lead to "the food revolution." Oman "revolutionary" in the diet (usually depending on some fame hungry peddled, "guru" training Health) will never be normal. National health reform organizations never laajakaistapalveluita food, which advocates only fruit and vegetables and not meat or vise-versa.
Government health agencies must address the masses and masses, such as meat, milk and milk products, fruit, vegetables, sweets, salt, refined grains, whole grains, fast food, and everything else out there. USDA tries to find a balance, which I hope will inspire Americans to eat better for the majority.
Nobody cares about a handful of loudmouth and low carbers Vegetarians. Official diet guidelines always contains all sorts of food-get over it.
Image credit wizkid1:
View the original article here